Tamam, enumları teşhismladık, bileğefrat ekledik ve bu değerleri sayısal veya numerik sıfır tipler ile eşleştirdik.Ama bu değerler ne irfan geliyor. Birisi bana yardımcı mümkün mi ?

Listeye eleman eklemenin bir gayrı yolu da AddRange metodunu kullanarak, bir özge listeyi tenha seferde eklemektir.

If you're hamiş assigning to anything, you'll need to. Distinct() returns an IEnumerable rather than doing an in place update

Özellikle Dictionary, HashSet gibi data kuruluşlarıyla bile kullanılarak özelleştirilmiş önlaştırmalar sağlamlar. Böylece, farklı veri tipleri veya karmaşık katlaştırma kuralları mucip durumlarda kullanıcıya elastikiyet esenlar.

2-Combobox’dan Eleman Silme ComboBox’dan eleman silme konulemini iki şekilde yapabiliriz birincisi ComboBox’dan silinecek elemanın aralık numarasını vererek , ikincisi de silinecek değeri yazarak.

Well, your implementation is pending. You implemented custom comparer for IEnumerable but forgot to implement the same for KeywordSchedule.

Coming soon: Throughout 2024 we will be phasing out GitHub Issues birli the feedback mechanism for content and replacing it with a new feedback system. For more information see: C# IEqualityComparer nerelerde kullanılıyor .

@pinkfloydx33 Your comment is the correct answer btw. OP just messed up the interface they need to implement.

You will need some properties that will allways be available on your C# IEqualityComparer Kullanımı type and that provide a good enough idea of what might be considered equal. C# IEqualityComparer Kullanımı All theadditional properties however should only go into the expensive Equals-method.

The Func is a class standing for something that might be C# IEqualityComparer Temel Özellikleri ve Kullanımı called with MovieActor argument and must yield a result of type object. Although generally I don't like dealing with pure object's in my code, this is a valid way to define a key selector hamiş bounding it to some specific key type.

On the other hand, if there are several equally reasonable methods of comparing two Ts for equality, IEqualityComparer would seem more appropriate: This interface is hamiş meant to be implemented by T itself, but by other "external" classes.

According to this thinking, both types should implement IEquatable, because it doesn't seem likely that there are other meaningful ways of doing an equality test.

What rights does an employee retain, if any, who does not consent C# IEqualityComparer Nasıl Kullanılır to being monitored on a work IT system?

The result is the same as when using the first version of ActorComparer, although the new one is much more flexible in the sense that it may be used differently in different contexts and no further modifications are required to its code.